A critical commentary on follow-up studies and “desistance” theories about transgender and gender non-conforming children

Temple-Newhook, Julie and Pickett, Sarah and Sinnott, Mari-Lynne and Pyne, Jake and Winters, Kelley and Feder, Stephen and Holmes, Cindy and Tosh, Jemma and Jamieson, Ally (2018) A critical commentary on follow-up studies and “desistance” theories about transgender and gender non-conforming children. International Journal of Transgenderism, 19 (2). pp. 212-224. ISSN 1434-4599

[English] PDF (The version available in this research repository is a preprint. Its content does not reflect the peer-review process and it lacks publisher layout and branding.) - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (216kB)

Abstract

Background: It has been widely suggested that over 80% of transgender children will come to identify as cisgender (i.e. desist) as they mature, with the assumption that for this 80%, the trans identity was a temporary “phase.” This statistic is used as the scientific rationale for discouraging social transition for pre-pubertal children. This article is a critical commentary on the limitations of this research and a caution against using these studies to develop care recommendations for gender non-conforming children. Methods: A critical review methodology is employed to systematically interpret four frequentlycited studies that sought to document identity outcomes for gender non-conforming children (often referred to as “desistance” research). Results: Methodological, theoretical, ethical, and interpretive concerns regarding four “desistance” studies are presented. The authors clarify the historical and clinical contexts within which these studies were conducted to deconstruct assumptions in interpretations of the results. The discussion makes distinctions between the specific evidence provided by these studies versus the assumptions that have shaped recommendations for care. The affirmative model is presented as a way to move away from the question of, “How should children’s gender identities develop over time?” toward a more useful question: “How should children best be supported as their gender identity develops?” Conclusion: The tethering of childhood gender diversity to the framework of “desistance” or “persistence” has stifled advancements in our understanding of children’s gender in all its complexity. These follow-up studies fall short in helping us understand what children need. As work begins on the 8th version of the Standards of Care by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, we call for a more inclusive conceptual framework that takes children’s voices seriously. Listening to children’s experiences will enable a more comprehensive understanding of the needs of gender non-conforming children and provide guidance to scientific and lay communities.

Actions (login required)

View Item