Selby, Jennifer A. (2013) Promoting the Everyday: Pro-Sharia Advocacy and Public Relations in Ontario, Canada’s “Sharia Debate”. Religions, 4 (3). pp. 423-442. ISSN 2077-1444
PDF (Migrated (PDF/A Conversion) from original format: (application/pdf))
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Why, in the midst of public debates related to religion, are unrepresentative orthodox perspectives often positioned as illustrative of a religious tradition? How can more representative voices be encouraged? Political theorist Anne Phillips (2007) suggests that facilitating multi-voiced individual engagements effectively dismantles the monopolies of the most conservative that tend to privilege maleness. In this paper, with reference to the 2003–2005 faith-based arbitration debate in Ontario, Canada, I show how, in practice, Phillips’ approach is unwieldy and does not work well in a sound-bite-necessitating culture. Instead, I argue that the “Sharia Debate” served as a catalyst for mainstream conservative Muslim groups in Ontario to develop public relations apparatuses that better facilitate the perspectives of everyday religious conservatives in the public sphere.
|Additional Information:||Memorial University Open Access Author's Fund|
|Keywords:||“Sharia Debate”, faith-based arbitration, representation, orthodoxy, advocacy, public relations, Muslims, Ontario, Canada|
|Department(s):||Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of > Religious Studies|
|Date:||17 September 2013|
Actions (login required)